A young woman, aged 24, found herself entangled in a complex family situation involving inheritance after the death of her grandmother, as her cousins felt entitled to the money she had received.
The Passing of Grandma
The woman’s father’s family consisted of four siblings: Adam, John, her father, and Anna (who was estranged and irrelevant to the story). The grandmother’s will dictated an equal division of her wealth among her four children.
The Offered Inheritance
Several months after the grandmother’s passing, John, one of the woman’s uncles, approached the young woman with an unexpected offer. John had retired, was financially secure, and felt he didn’t require any more money from the inheritance, so he offered it to her. The young woman accepted.
The Complexity of Family History
However, the family’s history added layers of complexity to the situation. The young woman’s grandmother had been unkind, cruel, and harbored prejudiced views. As the only queer and least white-passing grandchild, she was acutely aware of her grandmother’s foul attitudes.
Due to these poor memories of her grandmother, the woman did not feel grief in reaction to her death. Naturally, this made accepting the inheritance from her uncle feel morally problematic.
Moral Dilemmas Arise
The young woman discussed the decision with some of her friends. “They said that I was wrong to take the money, either because I was accepting money from a racist homophobe, or because I was taking her money while not caring for her and knowing she wouldn’t want me to have her money.”
A Disparity in Privilege
It was also worth noting that a wealth disparity existed between the woman and her cousins. She had completed graduate school without incurring debt, whereas her cousins faced financial struggles. One had a baby on the way, another earned a teacher’s salary, and the third was riddled with student debt. Regardless, the woman still chose to keep the inheritance.
The Unveiling of Financial Details
During a family dinner Zoom call, the young woman inadvertently disclosed her advantageous financial situation and talked about some expensive plans that she had. This revelation led to an uncomfortable shift in the atmosphere. Her cousins began to question how she could afford her plans, and the inheritance that she received from her uncle was revealed.
The cousins, in half-joking tones, began to ask why they hadn’t received a share of the inheritance. The woman’s Uncle John responded by stating that it was no longer his money and that her financial choices were not his concern.
Pressures to Share
This made it clear to the cousins that the inheritance was now out of John’s hands. “Since then I’ve been getting nonstop texts from my cousins and their parents asking me to share, or asking to borrow some money for now since I have cash”, wrote the woman. “They’ve brought up that I don’t need the money as much as them, and that they were her grandchildren too”.
The Inner Conflict
The young woman found herself in a moral conundrum. On one hand, her cousins faced genuine financial hardships, particularly her pregnant cousin, who was dealing with unfavorable maternity leave and childcare laws. On the other hand, the money could provide the woman with financial security, allowing her to make investments and plan for her future.
The Internet’s Perspective
The woman decided to post her moral dilemma online, hoping to read something that would help her make a decision. Many commenters defended the woman’s decision: “I suspect John gave it to YOU to stick it to your racist homophobic grandma”, wrote one. “Spend it happily, knowing it would have angered her.”
Not Your Responsibility
Almost everyone took the woman’s side. “There is a reason your uncle chose to give you this money, you are not required to bleed yourself dry for your cousins”, defended another reader. “Their father can share the money with them if he thinks it’s so important they get some of grandma’s dough.”
She Outed John
Whilst everyone agreed that the woman had done nothing wrong by keeping the money, one reader pointed out that it was not wise to disclose the details of this transaction. “You messed up by outing John as your benefactor”, one person accused, considering how it only caused the cousins further frustration.
MORE FROM SMART GAMING LAB – SHE GAVE HER ADOPTED DAUGHTER AN HEIRLOOM, BUT HER SISTER STOLE IT CLAIMING THAT THE ADOPTED DAUGHTER WASN’T A ‘REAL’ FAMILY MEMBER, SHE IS NOW DEMANDING IT’S RETURN
A woman gave her adopted daughter a family heirloom on her 11th birthday. However, the woman’s mean sister did something terrible and told her adopted niece she wasn’t the “real” oldest daughter.
GRANDPARENTS SAVE COLLEGE FUND FOR STUDENT’S OXFORD UNIVERSITY DREAM, BUT HALF-SISTER DEMANDS THE FUND AND INSISTS HE ATTENDS A DIFFERENT UNIVERSITY, WOULD YOU SACRIFICE THE DREAM?
An eighteen-year-old’s grandparents saved up a college fund for him, and he was offered his dream place at Oxford University upon graduating high school. However, his half-sister thought he should go to an American university, as he could receive financial assistance and give her the fund so she could use it.
HER SISTER-IN-LAW RAN A CHILDMINDING BUSINESS ILLEGALLY, SO SHE REPORTED HER AND THE BUSINESS GOT SHUT DOWN, DID SHE CROSS A BOUNDARY?
The woman ran her own daycare business, and when her sister-in-law decided to start her own childminding business without gaining the required qualifications, she decided to report her.
A WOMAN’S BROTHER TOOK HER TO COURT OVER THEIR UNCLE’S WILL: HE WANTED MORE THAN HE DESERVED, SHE WON BUT NOW INCURS THE WRATH OF THEIR FAMILY
A woman incurred the wrath of her family because she wanted to respect her uncle’s wishes in his will. Things escalated and now she is left worrying if she is in the wrong.
A WOMAN’S DAUGHTER RECEIVED MONEY AFTER HER FATHER DIED, HER HUSBAND NOW WANTS THE MONEY SPLIT EVENLY WITH HIS OWN CHILDREN, SURELY SHE CANNOT BE WRONG TO REJECT THIS?
A woman got into an argument with her new husband because he had different ideas about how her daughter’s money should be spent.
Images are for illustrative purposes only