A 29-year-old woman lived in a small, quiet town with her 30-year-old husband. The couple lived comfortably in their spacious home, until one day, when some unexpected neighbor drama arose.
The couple’s double income and choice to not have kids enabled them to afford a beautiful house with a coveted feature: a pool in the yard. Summer days often brought scorching heat, making the pool a delightful oasis.
The couple had, up until this point, maintained a friendly relationship with their neighbor. Unlike the couple, the neighbor was a 32-year-old single mother who had three children.
Babysitting and Neighborly Bonds
The woman and her husband occasionally babysat their neighbor’s children, which allowed them to get to know each other better. However, their homes were not close enough to keep in touch regularly.
A Poolside Intrusion
One morning, with her husband at work and her working from home, the woman heard unusual noises emanating from her yard. Curious and slightly concerned, she investigated and discovered her neighbor and her children swimming in their pool. This visit was uncharacteristic, as the neighbor had never ventured to their home uninvited before.
An Unwelcomed Borrowing
The woman approached the neighbor and her children with confusion. “I asked what was going on”, the woman explained. “Our neighbor explained that she had a day off from work, so she wanted to do something nice with her kids, she decided to “borrow” our pool since we don’t have much use for it since we are child-free”.
Politely Asked to Leave
The woman thought this was somewhat audacious and rude. “I asked her nicely to leave since they had come uninvited and were there without our permission”, she recounted.
A Defensive Response
To the woman’s surprise, the neighbor didn’t take the request well. Initially thinking it was a joke, she grew defensive and demanded valid reasons for her eviction. The woman chose not to provide explanations but firmly warned the neighbor of potential police involvement if she refused to leave and insisted that she refrain from uninvited visits.
An Invasion of Privacy
The neighbor reluctantly complied but not without a flurry of curses and accusations of classism. The woman was shocked by her neighbor’s apparent disregard for her and her husband’s privacy.
After the incident, the woman confided in her husband, father, and mother about the situation. Her husband and father found her actions reasonable, supporting her stance on privacy and boundaries. However, her mother believed she should have been more understanding toward the neighbor, emphasizing the challenges of being a hardworking single mom.
The woman now faced a moral dilemma. Whilst she felt that her reaction to her neighbor’s antics was completely justified, she did understand where her mother was coming from. She questioned whether she had overreacted, especially regarding the threats of calling the police.
The Internet’s Verdict
The woman headed online with her story, seeking the second opinion of online strangers. She was relieved to find that just about everyone in the comments section took her side. Most readers justified the woman’s actions, including one who concisely stated, “You can’t just use people’s things without permission!”
Permission and Liabilities
Everyone agreed with this sentiment, believing the woman’s anger was justified. “First, this is YOUR pool and you get to decide who can use it, much like you can decide who can just walk into your house”, one commenter wrote. “Second, there are liability issues if anyone gets hurt or worse. Third, when people start demanding your things, they have lost the moral high ground.”
An Audacious Action
Many commenters were shocked at the audacity of the neighbor. “It takes a lot of nerve to walk over to your neighbor’s house and just go in their pool!”, one person pointed out. “At least have the decency to knock on the door and ask or better yet, call you up and ask. Your yard is not a public pool. Just because you don’t have kids doesn’t make your pool open for all to use.”
MORE FROM SMART GAMING LAB – A WOMAN AND HER HUSBAND PAID OFF THE MORTGAGE ON THE HOUSE HE INHERITED WITH HIS SIBLINGS, WHEN HE WANTED TO “BUY OUT” HIS SIBLINGS WHO HADN’T CONTRIBUTED FINANCIALLY, SHE WAS FURIOUS
After her husband’s parents passed away, leaving a house to her husband and his siblings, she and her husband decided to make it their permanent home, causing conflict with his siblings.
AFTER TRAGICALLY LOSING HER FATHER TO CANCER AND INHERITING A ONE HUNDRED YEAR OLD HOME, SHE’S NOW FACING ENTITLED, RUDE AND MESSY SIBLINGS AND A VERY MESSY EVICTION
Imagine inheriting a family home that has been in your family for over a hundred years. Now, imagine having to share that home with a messy, entitled, and rude brother and his girlfriend who moved in without even asking. This is the reality for a 19-year-old girl who lost her father to cancer last year and inherited 90% of his possessions, including the family home.
HER HUSBAND LEFT MULTIPLE GIFTS TO BE OPENED EACH HOLIDAY AFTER HIS DEATH, BUT HER BROTHER-IN-LAW RUINED IT ALL AND NOW SHE WANTS TO BOOT HIM OUT
A woman lost her husband and a couple of weeks later let her brother-in-law and his kids move into their house after he lost his job. But it wasn’t long before he became a nuisance, and she had to kick him to the curb.
YOUNG LOTTERY WINNER BUYS HOUSE WITH MODEST WINNINGS, BUT FAMILY ACCUSES HER OF SELFISHNESS FOR NOT SHARING – WHO WAS IN THE RIGHT?
A young woman in London won nearly £70,000 in the lottery and used it to buy a house in North Yorkshire. Was she right to keep the money for herself, or should she have shared her winnings with her family? Find out what happened after her lottery win and how it changed her relationship with her loved ones.
A FATHER REFUSED TO PAY FOR HIS DAUGHTER’S WEDDING, SHE FAILED TO INVITE HER TWO BROTHERS WHO IDENTIFY AS LGBTQ+, HER FIANCÉ’S TRADITIONAL FAMILY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST HER BROTHERS
A 56-year-old father was happy to pay for his daughter’s wedding until she refused to invite two out of four siblings. His daughter said her soon-to-be in-laws were from a traditional country and would feel uncomfortable around anyone in a gay/ queer marriage. So she excluded her siblings, Alex and Tom, because they were both married to men, and one identified as non-binary.
Images are for illustrative purposes only