An individual’s great aunt sadly passed away, leaving behind a legacy that would unexpectedly stir familial tensions. Disagreements over how the money is to be shared and who is owed what result in family feuds and tension. Here is what they had to say:
Revealing The Will
Upon her passing, it was discovered that the great-aunt had made an unusual adjustment to her will. She had chosen to include the individual and their siblings, as well as their aunt’s children (the cousins), while explicitly excluding the individual’s uncle and the grandfather
The Surprising Details
These details took the family by surprise. Whilst the uncle had not maintained a particularly close relationship with the deceased aunt, their interactions too had been limited, so it was strange that they were included but not the uncle.
The Intent Behind The Will
However, the will’s contents expressed the great aunt’s intentions clearly. She had modified her will to show gratitude to those who had provided care and companionship during her later years, a time when she was elderly and alone. She greatly appreciated the times when the individual and their family visited her toward the end of her life.
When news of the will’s contents reached the uncle, he was furious. ‘He kicked off, making threatening calls to my aunt blaming her for “conning him out of money” and was telling my mother “If you don’t split the money you’re splitting my family up” amongst other things.’
Initially, the individual contemplated sharing the inheritance with their uncle and his children. However, given his hostile response, threats, and refusal to participate in the funeral or assist in clearing the aunt’s belongings, their perspective shifted. It seemed apparent that the uncle’s primary concern was the money, and he appeared indifferent to their great aunt’s memory.
The individual’s siblings and cousins shared their perspectives, leading to a unanimous decision not to divide the inheritance with the uncle. They were wary of being manipulated and blackmailed.
After the inheritance had been distributed, it was not just the uncle who was angry. The individual’s grandfather had written them a furious letter. “He said he never wants to see or speak to us again because we did not share the money and a similar message from my uncle followed”, the individual recounted.
Reflecting On The Decision
The individual understandably felt hurt by the turn of events but remained resolute in their decision. They were unwilling to be coerced into sharing the inheritance when it appeared that their uncle’s and now their grandfather’s motives were driven solely by financial gain.
Consideration For The Cousins
The writer couldn’t help but feel sympathy for their uncle’s children, who were also excluded from the inheritance. However, the cousins had limited familiarity with the great-aunt, and the grandfather indicated in his letter that he intended to provide compensation for them in the future.
In retrospect, the individual wondered if they had acted wrongly. It was clear to them that their uncle and grandfather were being driven by avarice, but it also felt wrong that only they had been left with their great aunt’s money.
The individual took their family dilemma online, asking internet dwellers for their perspective on the matter. Everybody took the person’s side, with one commenter writing, “If they cared as much about her when she was alive as they care about her money now that she’s passed, they wouldn’t be in this spot.”
Other readers commented on the nasty attitude that the grandfather and uncle had revealed. “Everyone’s true colors show when large amounts of money are involved”, someone pointed out. “You’re probably better off without them”.
Memories Over Money
Other commenters pointed out that it was clear that the uncle and grandfather were not the right people to receive this money. “Anyone who threatens to boycott the funeral of a family member over money definitely doesn’t deserve it”, someone stated. “I don’t care if we’re talking about $5 or $500,000 – you should just honor your grandmother’s wishes.”
MORE FROM SMART GAMING LAB – A WOMAN AND HER HUSBAND PAID OFF THE MORTGAGE ON THE HOUSE HE INHERITED WITH HIS SIBLINGS, WHEN HE WANTED TO “BUY OUT” HIS SIBLINGS WHO HADN’T CONTRIBUTED FINANCIALLY, SHE WAS FURIOUS
After her husband’s parents passed away, leaving a house to her husband and his siblings, she and her husband decided to make it their permanent home, causing conflict with his siblings.
AFTER TRAGICALLY LOSING HER FATHER TO CANCER AND INHERITING A ONE HUNDRED YEAR OLD HOME, SHE’S NOW FACING ENTITLED, RUDE AND MESSY SIBLINGS AND A VERY MESSY EVICTION
Imagine inheriting a family home that has been in your family for over a hundred years. Now, imagine having to share that home with a messy, entitled, and rude brother and his girlfriend who moved in without even asking. This is the reality for a 19-year-old girl who lost her father to cancer last year and inherited 90% of his possessions, including the family home.
HER HUSBAND LEFT MULTIPLE GIFTS TO BE OPENED EACH HOLIDAY AFTER HIS DEATH, BUT HER BROTHER-IN-LAW RUINED IT ALL AND NOW SHE WANTS TO BOOT HIM OUT
A woman lost her husband and a couple of weeks later let her brother-in-law and his kids move into their house after he lost his job. But it wasn’t long before he became a nuisance, and she had to kick him to the curb.
YOUNG LOTTERY WINNER BUYS HOUSE WITH MODEST WINNINGS, BUT FAMILY ACCUSES HER OF SELFISHNESS FOR NOT SHARING – WHO WAS IN THE RIGHT?
A young woman in London won nearly £70,000 in the lottery and used it to buy a house in North Yorkshire. Was she right to keep the money for herself, or should she have shared her winnings with her family? Find out what happened after her lottery win and how it changed her relationship with her loved ones.
A FATHER REFUSED TO PAY FOR HIS DAUGHTER’S WEDDING, SHE FAILED TO INVITE HER TWO BROTHERS WHO IDENTIFY AS LGBTQ+, HER FIANCÉ’S TRADITIONAL FAMILY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST HER BROTHERS
A 56-year-old father was happy to pay for his daughter’s wedding until she refused to invite two out of four siblings. His daughter said her soon-to-be in-laws were from a traditional country and would feel uncomfortable around anyone in a gay/ queer marriage. So she excluded her siblings, Alex and Tom, because they were both married to men, and one identified as non-binary.
Images are for illustrative purposes only